PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-17.67%
Revenue decline while BB shows 18.89% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-19.37%
Cost reduction while BB shows 20.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-17.12%
Gross profit decline while BB shows 16.45% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
0.66%
Margin expansion while BB shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
3.84%
R&D growth less than half of BB's 10.62%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
22.75%
G&A change of 22.75% while BB maintains overhead. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
-11.29%
Marketing expense reduction while BB shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.91%
Operating expenses reduction while BB shows 16.89% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-9.07%
Total costs reduction while BB shows 19.77% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
16.67%
Interest expense change of 16.67% while BB maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
8.60%
D&A growth 1.25-1.5x BB's 6.67%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize asset base.
-38.16%
EBITDA decline while BB shows 14.57% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-17.80%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-30.08%
Operating income decline while BB shows 16.04% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-15.08%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-4.82%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-29.09%
Pre-tax income decline while BB shows 14.37% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-13.88%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-57.43%
Tax expense reduction while BB shows 14.39% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-21.13%
Net income decline while BB shows 14.36% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-4.21%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-20.51%
EPS decline while BB shows 19.18% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-20.78%
Diluted EPS decline while BB shows 19.18% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.91%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-0.70%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.