PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
20.22%
Positive growth while BB shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
49.27%
Cost increase while BB reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
12.15%
Positive growth while BB shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-6.71%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
1.80%
R&D growth while BB reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
-3.70%
G&A reduction while BB shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
29.72%
Marketing expense change of 29.72% while BB maintains spending. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate effectiveness.
1350.00%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x BB's 6.82%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
13.47%
Operating expenses growth while BB reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
26.77%
Total costs growth while BB reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
1.06%
Interest expense change of 1.06% while BB maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
-6.61%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
10.90%
EBITDA growth while BB declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-8.46%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
10.98%
Operating income growth while BB declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-7.69%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
137.86%
Other expenses change of 137.86% while BB maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
12.77%
Pre-tax income growth while BB declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-6.20%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
3.00%
Tax expense growth while BB reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
15.44%
Net income growth while BB declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-3.98%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
16.18%
EPS growth while BB declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
14.71%
Diluted EPS growth while BB declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.12%
Share count reduction below 50% of BB's 0.03%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
-0.29%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.