503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
14.09%
Positive growth while BB shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
22.52%
Cost increase while BB reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
9.42%
Positive growth while BB shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-4.09%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-5.29%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
-4.69%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
15.75%
Marketing expense change of 15.75% while BB maintains spending. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate effectiveness.
-497.14%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
4.67%
Operating expenses growth while BB reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
13.78%
Total costs growth while BB reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.62%
Interest expense change of 0.62% while BB maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
6.51%
D&A growth while BB reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
27.36%
EBITDA growth below 50% of BB's 284.21%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-2.37%
EBITDA margin decline while BB shows 437.47% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
33.06%
Operating income growth while BB declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
16.63%
Operating margin growth while BB declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
42.31%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x BB's 23.08%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
33.14%
Pre-tax income growth while BB declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
16.70%
Pre-tax margin growth while BB declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
46.53%
Tax expense growth 50-75% of BB's 62.07%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
29.14%
Net income growth while BB declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
13.19%
Net margin growth while BB declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
29.09%
EPS growth while BB declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
31.48%
Diluted EPS growth while BB declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.25%
Share count reduction while BB shows 0.09% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.65%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.