PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
16.77%
Positive growth while BB shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
36.98%
Cost increase while BB reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
5.71%
Positive growth while BB shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-9.47%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-2.09%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
-4.24%
G&A reduction while BB shows 9.77% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
18.81%
Marketing expense change of 18.81% while BB maintains spending. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate effectiveness.
84.95%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x BB's 45.22%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
7.03%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x BB's 0.53%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
21.83%
Total costs growth while BB reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
24.10%
Interest expense change of 24.10% while BB maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
5.68%
D&A growth while BB reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
4.02%
EBITDA growth while BB declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-9.64%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
4.02%
Operating income growth while BB declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-10.92%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
38.93%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x BB's 25.00%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
6.20%
Pre-tax income growth while BB declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-9.05%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
36.99%
Tax expense growth while BB reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
2.37%
Net income growth while BB declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-12.33%
Net margin decline while BB shows 0.71% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
3.28%
EPS growth while BB declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1.64%
Diluted EPS growth while BB declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.40%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-0.41%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.