PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-13.72%
Revenue decline while BB shows 11.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-21.78%
Cost reduction while BB shows 2.30% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-8.01%
Gross profit decline while BB shows 27.57% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
6.62%
Margin expansion below 50% of BB's 14.07%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
2.76%
R&D growth while BB reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
9.83%
G&A growth while BB reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
-13.99%
Marketing expense reduction while BB shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-250.00%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-4.71%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-14.19%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
10.03%
Interest expense change of 10.03% while BB maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
10.56%
D&A growth while BB reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-12.33%
EBITDA decline while BB shows 384.38% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
6.47%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of BB's 408.49%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-12.33%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
1.61%
Operating margin growth while BB declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-44.44%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-13.99%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.31%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
52.93%
Tax expense growth while BB reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-25.15%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-13.25%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-23.81%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-24.19%
Diluted EPS decline while BB shows 29.17% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.87%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-0.82%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.