PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
0.40%
Positive growth while BB shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
3.33%
Cost increase while BB reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
-1.36%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1.76%
Margin decline while BB shows 5.09% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
5.57%
R&D growth 50-75% of BB's 8.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine spending effectiveness.
14.12%
G&A growth above 1.5x BB's 1.13%. Michael Burry would check for operational inefficiency.
17.38%
Marketing expense change of 17.38% while BB maintains spending. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate effectiveness.
20.41%
Other expenses growth less than half of BB's 700.00%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
12.21%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x BB's 5.51%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
7.71%
Total costs growth while BB reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
1.47%
Interest expense growth less than half of BB's 803.70%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
11.89%
D&A growth while BB reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
6.04%
EBITDA growth while BB declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-13.03%
EBITDA margin decline while BB shows 11.26% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-41.70%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-41.93%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
208.10%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x BB's 6.25%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
-33.54%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-33.81%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-82.42%
Tax expense reduction while BB shows 41.94% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-16.88%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-17.21%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-16.67%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-17.02%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.67%
Share count reduction while BB shows 0.21% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.70%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.