PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
17.85%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x BB's 1.28%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
33.66%
Cost increase while BB reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
9.80%
Gross profit growth 50-75% of BB's 16.67%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive position.
-6.83%
Margin decline while BB shows 15.20% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-1.96%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
-4.89%
G&A reduction while BB shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
19.67%
Marketing expense change of 19.67% while BB maintains spending. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate effectiveness.
187.18%
Other expenses growth 1.25-1.5x BB's 132.11%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize cost items.
7.28%
Operating expenses growth while BB reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
20.26%
Total costs growth while BB reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
3.87%
Interest expense change of 3.87% while BB maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
1.48%
D&A growth while BB reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
9.88%
EBITDA growth below 50% of BB's 22.22%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-6.07%
EBITDA margin decline while BB shows 102.47% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
12.60%
Operating income growth while BB declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-4.46%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
77.54%
Other expenses growth while BB reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
14.84%
Pre-tax income growth while BB declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-2.55%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
998.79%
Tax expense growth above 1.5x BB's 300.00%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
-195.83%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-181.32%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-196.47%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-197.62%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.03%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x BB's 0.05%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
-1.14%
Diluted share reduction while BB shows 8.79% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.