PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-7.26%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-16.22%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-1.70%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
5.99%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x BB's 1.10%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
6.02%
R&D change of 6.02% while BB maintains spending. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate effectiveness.
8.93%
G&A growth 1.1-1.25x BB's 7.27%. Bill Ackman would demand evidence of necessary spending.
-4.98%
Marketing expense reduction while BB shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-79.41%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
0.90%
Operating expenses growth less than half of BB's 2.87%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-8.46%
Total costs reduction while BB shows 0.37% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-1.00%
Interest expense reduction while BB shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
6.86%
D&A growth while BB reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-1.90%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
6.04%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of BB's 540.63%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-4.46%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
3.02%
Operating margin growth while BB declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-28.78%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-5.76%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
1.62%
Pre-tax margin growth while BB declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-92.13%
Tax expense reduction while BB shows 9375.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
217.80%
Net income growth while BB declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
227.02%
Net margin growth while BB declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
217.07%
EPS growth while BB declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
215.85%
Diluted EPS growth while BB declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.16%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
1.09%
Diluted share increase while BB reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.