PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
10.29%
Similar revenue growth to BB's 12.83%. Walter Schloss would investigate if similar growth reflects similar quality.
2.38%
Cost increase while BB reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
14.23%
Gross profit growth 50-75% of BB's 21.18%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive position.
3.58%
Margin expansion below 50% of BB's 7.40%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
4.56%
R&D growth while BB reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
20.87%
G&A growth 1.1-1.25x BB's 17.20%. Bill Ackman would demand evidence of necessary spending.
8.70%
Marketing expense change of 8.70% while BB maintains spending. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate effectiveness.
-856.25%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
8.35%
Operating expenses growth 1.25-1.5x BB's 6.08%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize control.
5.35%
Total costs growth above 1.5x BB's 1.69%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-0.30%
Interest expense reduction while BB shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-0.07%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
22.02%
EBITDA growth below 50% of BB's 129.63%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
3.45%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of BB's 21.86%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
19.96%
Operating income growth while BB declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
8.77%
Operating margin growth while BB declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
31.72%
Other expenses growth less than half of BB's 100.00%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
20.12%
Pre-tax income growth while BB declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
8.91%
Pre-tax margin growth while BB declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-135.24%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
49.70%
Net income growth while BB declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
35.73%
Net margin growth while BB declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
49.57%
EPS growth while BB declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
50.00%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of BB's 900.00%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.22%
Share count reduction while BB shows 1.27% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.18%
Diluted share reduction while BB shows 2.44% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.