503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
11.65%
Positive growth while BB shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
18.76%
Cost increase while BB reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
8.38%
Positive growth while BB shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-2.93%
Margin decline while BB shows 0.66% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
0.83%
R&D growth while BB reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
5.66%
G&A growth 50-75% of BB's 9.09%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine operational efficiency.
13.74%
Marketing expense change of 13.74% while BB maintains spending. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate effectiveness.
-5.56%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
6.97%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x BB's 0.41%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
12.99%
Total costs growth while BB reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
2.67%
Interest expense change of 2.67% while BB maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
7.81%
D&A growth above 1.5x BB's 1.89%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
9.18%
EBITDA growth below 50% of BB's 22.22%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-2.77%
EBITDA margin decline while BB shows 13.23% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
9.50%
Operating income growth while BB declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-1.93%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.03%
Pre-tax income growth while BB declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.56%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
21.31%
Tax expense growth while BB reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
9.09%
Net income growth while BB declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-2.29%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
9.29%
EPS growth while BB declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
9.42%
Diluted EPS growth while BB declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.17%
Share count reduction while BB shows 0.09% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.25%
Diluted share reduction while BB shows 0.08% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.