PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-5.11%
Revenue decline while BB shows 9.43% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-11.19%
Cost reduction while BB shows 1.47% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-2.04%
Gross profit decline while BB shows 12.50% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
3.23%
Margin expansion 1.25-1.5x BB's 2.81%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
6.17%
Similar R&D growth to BB's 6.45%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry innovation requirements.
13.56%
G&A change of 13.56% while BB maintains overhead. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
-0.45%
Marketing expense reduction while BB shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
84.21%
Other expenses growth while BB reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
3.88%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x BB's 2.07%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-4.21%
Total costs reduction while BB shows 1.94% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-6.12%
Interest expense reduction while BB shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-2.65%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-5.86%
EBITDA decline while BB shows 300.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.55%
EBITDA margin decline while BB shows 138.08% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-6.59%
Operating income decline while BB shows 32.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1.57%
Operating margin decline while BB shows 38.37% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-168.04%
Other expenses reduction while BB shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-8.82%
Pre-tax income decline while BB shows 30.23% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-3.91%
Pre-tax margin decline while BB shows 36.24% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-14.16%
Tax expense reduction while BB shows 100.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-7.70%
Net income decline while BB shows 27.27% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.73%
Net margin decline while BB shows 33.54% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-7.84%
EPS decline while BB shows 27.60% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-7.28%
Diluted EPS decline while BB shows 27.58% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.25%
Share count reduction while BB shows 0.41% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.21%
Diluted share reduction while BB shows 0.37% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.