PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
8.60%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x BB's 5.62%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
12.43%
Cost growth above 1.5x BB's 1.45%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
6.85%
Similar gross profit growth to BB's 7.07%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry dynamics.
-1.61%
Margin decline while BB shows 1.38% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
6.69%
R&D growth while BB reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
30.09%
G&A growth while BB reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
10.30%
Marketing expense change of 10.30% while BB maintains spending. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate effectiveness.
600.00%
Other expenses growth while BB reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
10.98%
Operating expenses growth while BB reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
11.70%
Total costs growth while BB reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
11.73%
Interest expense change of 11.73% while BB maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
12.38%
D&A growth while BB reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
9.44%
Similar EBITDA growth to BB's 12.20%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
-3.84%
EBITDA margin decline while BB shows 1168.72% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
3.33%
Operating income growth while BB declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-4.85%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
111.36%
Other expenses change of 111.36% while BB maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
4.51%
Pre-tax income growth while BB declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-3.77%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
6.17%
Tax expense growth while BB reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
4.19%
Net income growth while BB declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-4.07%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
4.96%
EPS growth while BB declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
4.29%
Diluted EPS growth while BB declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.29%
Share count reduction while BB shows 0.37% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.33%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.