PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
10.66%
Positive growth while BB shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
7.25%
Cost increase while BB reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
12.21%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x BB's 2.01%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
1.40%
Margin expansion below 50% of BB's 5.90%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
9.28%
R&D growth while BB reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
14.69%
G&A growth 1.25-1.5x BB's 10.84%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize overhead control.
15.25%
Marketing expense change of 15.25% while BB maintains spending. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate effectiveness.
266.67%
Other expenses growth while BB reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
12.51%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x BB's 2.21%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
9.73%
Total costs growth while BB reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-12.64%
Interest expense reduction while BB shows 211.34% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
13.90%
D&A growth above 1.5x BB's 8.89%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
16.60%
EBITDA growth below 50% of BB's 400.00%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
1.16%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of BB's 181.77%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
12.01%
Operating income growth while BB declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1.22%
Operating margin growth while BB declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
64.89%
Other expenses growth 50-75% of BB's 100.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine cost efficiency.
12.58%
Pre-tax income growth while BB declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1.74%
Pre-tax margin growth while BB declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
65.65%
Tax expense change of 65.65% while BB maintains burden. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate strategy.
6.48%
Net income growth while BB declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-3.78%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
6.83%
EPS growth while BB declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
6.90%
Diluted EPS growth while BB declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.16%
Share count reduction while BB shows 0.64% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.21%
Diluted share reduction while BB shows 0.65% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.