PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
14.15%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x BB's 0.57%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
24.29%
Cost growth above 1.5x BB's 5.00%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
9.78%
Positive growth while BB shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-3.83%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
2.84%
R&D growth above 1.5x BB's 1.75%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
7.54%
G&A growth 50-75% of BB's 13.70%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine operational efficiency.
18.30%
Marketing expense change of 18.30% while BB maintains spending. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate effectiveness.
-166.67%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
9.52%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x BB's 5.68%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
17.55%
Total costs growth above 1.5x BB's 5.51%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-2.60%
Interest expense reduction while BB shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
8.84%
D&A growth while BB reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
9.78%
EBITDA growth while BB declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-4.11%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
9.93%
Operating income growth while BB declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-3.70%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-6.29%
Other expenses reduction while BB shows 50.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
9.70%
Pre-tax income growth while BB declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-3.90%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
19636.84%
Tax expense change of 19636.84% while BB maintains burden. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate strategy.
-8.49%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-19.83%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-8.42%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-8.49%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.11%
Share count reduction while BB shows 0.79% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.16%
Diluted share reduction while BB shows 0.13% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.