PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-4.58%
Revenue decline while BB shows 5.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-7.93%
Cost reduction while BB shows 6.35% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-2.94%
Gross profit decline while BB shows 4.46% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
1.71%
Margin expansion while BB shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
9.52%
R&D growth while BB reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
6.94%
G&A growth while BB reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
4.02%
Marketing expense change of 4.02% while BB maintains spending. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate effectiveness.
-175.00%
Other expenses reduction while BB shows 264.18% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
6.87%
Operating expenses growth while BB reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-1.65%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-4.19%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
7.92%
D&A growth while BB reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-6.24%
EBITDA decline while BB shows 54.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1.58%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-8.46%
Operating income decline while BB shows 136.17% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-4.07%
Operating margin decline while BB shows 134.40% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-164.93%
Other expenses reduction while BB shows 2600.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-10.33%
Pre-tax income decline while BB shows 153.52% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-6.02%
Pre-tax margin decline while BB shows 150.90% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-7.68%
Tax expense reduction while BB shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-10.86%
Net income decline while BB shows 151.39% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-6.58%
Net margin decline while BB shows 148.88% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-10.80%
EPS decline while BB shows 152.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-10.48%
Diluted EPS decline while BB shows 80.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.16%
Share count reduction while BB shows 0.54% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.28%
Diluted share reduction while BB shows 11.25% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.