PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
5.07%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x BB's 0.54%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
5.21%
Cost increase while BB reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
5.01%
Similar gross profit growth to BB's 5.98%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry dynamics.
-0.06%
Margin decline while BB shows 5.41% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
8.61%
R&D growth while BB reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
18.18%
G&A growth while BB reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
12.67%
Marketing expense change of 12.67% while BB maintains spending. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate effectiveness.
-109.09%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
11.37%
Operating expenses growth while BB reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
8.05%
Total costs growth while BB reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-1.39%
Interest expense reduction while BB shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
5.46%
D&A growth while BB reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
3.42%
EBITDA growth below 50% of BB's 117.65%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-3.30%
EBITDA margin decline while BB shows 140.80% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.83%
Operating income growth while BB declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-4.04%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
72.99%
Other expenses growth while BB reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
1.47%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of BB's 90.79%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-3.43%
Pre-tax margin decline while BB shows 89.76% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
8.23%
Tax expense growth while BB reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.07%
Net income growth below 50% of BB's 94.59%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-4.76%
Net margin decline while BB shows 93.54% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.45%
EPS growth below 50% of BB's 76.92%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.45%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of BB's 560.00%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.25%
Share count reduction while BB shows 11.48% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.37%
Diluted share reduction while BB shows 0.75% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.