503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
5.24%
Growth of 5.24% while BB shows flat revenue. Bruce Berkowitz would examine growth quality advantage.
13.18%
Cost increase while BB reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
1.70%
Similar gross profit growth to BB's 1.92%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry dynamics.
-3.36%
Margin decline while BB shows 1.92% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
3.26%
R&D growth above 1.5x BB's 1.89%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
67.17%
G&A growth above 1.5x BB's 4.88%. Michael Burry would check for operational inefficiency.
10.79%
Marketing expense change of 10.79% while BB maintains spending. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate effectiveness.
-22.58%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
12.99%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x BB's 1.85%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
13.09%
Total costs growth above 1.5x BB's 0.44%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-2.00%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
30.75%
D&A growth while BB reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-0.45%
EBITDA decline while BB shows 81.17% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-5.77%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-5.20%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-9.92%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-211.11%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-5.72%
Pre-tax income decline while BB shows 72.47% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-10.41%
Pre-tax margin decline while BB shows 72.47% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.54%
Tax expense reduction while BB shows 66.67% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-6.44%
Net income decline while BB shows 70.17% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-11.10%
Net margin decline while BB shows 70.17% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-6.38%
EPS decline while BB shows 69.79% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-6.38%
Diluted EPS decline while BB shows 69.79% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.08%
Share count reduction while BB shows 0.07% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.16%
Diluted share reduction while BB shows 0.07% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.