PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
6.30%
Positive growth while BB shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
4.14%
Cost increase while BB reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
7.26%
Positive growth while BB shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
0.90%
Margin expansion below 50% of BB's 2.68%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-3.51%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
33.72%
G&A growth while BB reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
7.90%
Marketing expense change of 7.90% while BB maintains spending. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate effectiveness.
34.41%
Other expenses growth while BB reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
5.31%
Operating expenses growth while BB reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
4.69%
Total costs growth less than half of BB's 16.96%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-2.82%
Interest expense reduction while BB shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
9.16%
D&A growth while BB reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
12.29%
Similar EBITDA growth to BB's 13.33%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
2.63%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of BB's 1745.23%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
8.51%
Operating income growth below 50% of BB's 21150.00%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
2.07%
Operating margin growth below 50% of BB's 23659.27%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
47.35%
Other expenses growth less than half of BB's 200.00%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
9.06%
Income change of 9.06% while BB is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
2.59%
Margin change of 2.59% while BB is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
6.22%
Tax expense growth while BB reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
9.74%
Net income growth while BB declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
3.23%
Net margin growth while BB declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
9.76%
EPS growth while BB declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
9.80%
Diluted EPS growth while BB declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.09%
Share count reduction while BB shows 0.44% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
0.04%
Diluted share increase while BB reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.