PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
3.75%
Positive growth while CORZ shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
5.34%
Cost growth above 1.5x CORZ's 3.21%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
3.28%
Positive growth while CORZ shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-0.45%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
3.06%
R&D change of 3.06% while CORZ maintains spending. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate effectiveness.
-1.22%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
10.75%
Marketing expense change of 10.75% while CORZ maintains spending. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate effectiveness.
935.00%
Other expenses growth less than half of CORZ's 7192.07%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
6.07%
Operating expenses growth less than half of CORZ's 1546.86%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
5.81%
Similar total costs growth to CORZ's 6.90%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
-100.00%
Interest expense reduction while CORZ shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
4.05%
D&A growth while CORZ reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-74.07%
EBITDA decline while CORZ shows 38.29% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
1.80%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of CORZ's 37.59%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-96.99%
Operating income decline while CORZ shows 38.29% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-97.10%
Operating margin decline while CORZ shows 37.59% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
1618.18%
Other expenses growth while CORZ reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-94.36%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-94.56%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-32.19%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-109.63%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-109.28%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-109.62%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-109.78%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.15%
Share count reduction while CORZ shows 0.89% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-1.29%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.