PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
14.60%
Positive growth while CORZ shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
27.05%
Cost growth above 1.5x CORZ's 3.21%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
9.44%
Positive growth while CORZ shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-4.50%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
13.85%
R&D change of 13.85% while CORZ maintains spending. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate effectiveness.
17.75%
G&A growth while CORZ reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
32.19%
Marketing expense change of 32.19% while CORZ maintains spending. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate effectiveness.
8.33%
Other expenses growth less than half of CORZ's 7192.07%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
23.18%
Operating expenses growth less than half of CORZ's 1546.86%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
24.90%
Total costs growth above 1.5x CORZ's 6.90%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-3.43%
Interest expense reduction while CORZ shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
38.80%
D&A growth while CORZ reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
21.71%
EBITDA growth 50-75% of CORZ's 38.29%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
-11.37%
EBITDA margin decline while CORZ shows 37.59% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-7.05%
Operating income decline while CORZ shows 38.29% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-18.90%
Operating margin decline while CORZ shows 37.59% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
658.82%
Other expenses growth while CORZ reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-5.46%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-17.51%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
51.50%
Tax expense growth while CORZ reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-18.52%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-28.90%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-17.65%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-19.12%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.46%
Share count reduction while CORZ shows 0.89% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.26%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.