PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
16.77%
Positive growth while CORZ shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
36.98%
Cost growth above 1.5x CORZ's 3.21%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
5.71%
Positive growth while CORZ shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-9.47%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-2.09%
R&D reduction while CORZ shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-4.24%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
18.81%
Marketing expense change of 18.81% while CORZ maintains spending. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate effectiveness.
84.95%
Other expenses growth less than half of CORZ's 7192.07%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
7.03%
Operating expenses growth less than half of CORZ's 1546.86%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
21.83%
Total costs growth above 1.5x CORZ's 6.90%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
24.10%
Interest expense change of 24.10% while CORZ maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
5.68%
D&A growth while CORZ reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
4.02%
EBITDA growth below 50% of CORZ's 38.29%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-9.64%
EBITDA margin decline while CORZ shows 37.59% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
4.02%
Operating income growth below 50% of CORZ's 38.29%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-10.92%
Operating margin decline while CORZ shows 37.59% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
38.93%
Other expenses growth while CORZ reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
6.20%
Pre-tax income growth while CORZ declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-9.05%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
36.99%
Tax expense growth while CORZ reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
2.37%
Net income growth while CORZ declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-12.33%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
3.28%
EPS growth while CORZ declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1.64%
Diluted EPS growth while CORZ declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.40%
Share count reduction while CORZ shows 0.89% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.41%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.