PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
8.60%
Positive growth while CORZ shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
12.43%
Cost growth above 1.5x CORZ's 3.21%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
6.85%
Positive growth while CORZ shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-1.61%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
6.69%
R&D change of 6.69% while CORZ maintains spending. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate effectiveness.
30.09%
G&A growth while CORZ reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
10.30%
Marketing expense change of 10.30% while CORZ maintains spending. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate effectiveness.
600.00%
Other expenses growth less than half of CORZ's 7192.07%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
10.98%
Operating expenses growth less than half of CORZ's 1546.86%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
11.70%
Total costs growth above 1.5x CORZ's 6.90%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
11.73%
Interest expense change of 11.73% while CORZ maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
12.38%
D&A growth while CORZ reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
9.44%
EBITDA growth below 50% of CORZ's 38.29%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-3.84%
EBITDA margin decline while CORZ shows 37.59% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
3.33%
Operating income growth below 50% of CORZ's 38.29%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-4.85%
Operating margin decline while CORZ shows 37.59% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
111.36%
Other expenses growth while CORZ reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
4.51%
Pre-tax income growth while CORZ declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-3.77%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
6.17%
Tax expense growth while CORZ reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
4.19%
Net income growth while CORZ declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-4.07%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
4.96%
EPS growth while CORZ declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
4.29%
Diluted EPS growth while CORZ declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.29%
Share count reduction while CORZ shows 0.89% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.33%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.