PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-1.81%
Revenue decline while CORZ shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-2.47%
Cost reduction while CORZ shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-1.52%
Gross profit decline while CORZ shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
0.29%
Margin change of 0.29% while CORZ shows flat margins. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality advantage.
-1.55%
R&D reduction while CORZ shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-15.44%
G&A reduction while CORZ shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
-22.37%
Marketing expense reduction while CORZ shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-72.73%
Other expenses reduction while CORZ shows 100.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-12.50%
Operating expenses reduction while CORZ shows 5322.42% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-7.31%
Total costs reduction while CORZ shows 20118.79% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-2.53%
Interest expense reduction while CORZ shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-3.95%
D&A reduction while CORZ shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
0.64%
EBITDA growth while CORZ declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
6.36%
Margin change of 6.36% while CORZ is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
5.99%
Operating income growth below 50% of CORZ's 3131.97%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
7.94%
Margin change of 7.94% while CORZ is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
-7.74%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
5.77%
Pre-tax income growth while CORZ declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
7.72%
Margin change of 7.72% while CORZ is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
-99.36%
Tax expense reduction while CORZ shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
24.59%
Net income growth while CORZ declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
26.89%
Margin change of 26.89% while CORZ is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
24.66%
EPS growth while CORZ declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
24.88%
Diluted EPS growth while CORZ declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.19%
Share count reduction while CORZ shows 612.99% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.18%
Diluted share reduction while CORZ shows 612.99% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.