PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-0.26%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-5.70%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
2.25%
Positive growth while CORZ shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
2.52%
Margin expansion while CORZ shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
7.15%
R&D growth less than half of CORZ's 30.68%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
-3.29%
G&A reduction while CORZ shows 30.91% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
-0.62%
Marketing expense reduction while CORZ shows 6.24% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-187.57%
Other expenses reduction while CORZ shows 100.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
2.65%
Operating expenses growth less than half of CORZ's 28.57%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-2.03%
Total costs reduction while CORZ shows 1.64% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-11.99%
Interest expense reduction while CORZ shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
1.14%
D&A growth while CORZ reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
1.87%
EBITDA growth below 50% of CORZ's 44.71%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.42%
EBITDA margin growth while CORZ declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
2.03%
Operating income growth while CORZ declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
2.30%
Operating margin growth while CORZ declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-68.77%
Other expenses reduction while CORZ shows 49.04% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
0.76%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of CORZ's 43.45%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
1.02%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of CORZ's 16.31%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
2.84%
Tax expense growth while CORZ reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.32%
Net income growth below 50% of CORZ's 43.44%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.58%
Net margin growth below 50% of CORZ's 16.30%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.34%
EPS growth below 50% of CORZ's 65.41%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.34%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of CORZ's 65.41%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.01%
Share count reduction while CORZ shows 63.85% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
0.05%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x CORZ's 63.85%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.