503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-0.65%
Revenue decline while CRWD shows 5.94% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-23.18%
Cost reduction while CRWD shows 7.31% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
4.46%
Similar gross profit growth to CRWD's 5.45%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry dynamics.
5.15%
Margin expansion while CRWD shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-8.08%
R&D reduction while CRWD shows 3.75% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.00%
Similar operating expenses growth to CRWD's 3.48%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
-5.86%
Total costs reduction while CRWD shows 4.38% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
185.62%
D&A growth while CRWD reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
29.53%
EBITDA growth while CRWD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
78.43%
EBITDA margin growth while CRWD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
5.63%
Operating income growth 50-75% of CRWD's 9.37%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
6.33%
Operating margin growth below 50% of CRWD's 14.45%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
5.19%
Other expenses growth less than half of CRWD's 18.80%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
5.51%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of CRWD's 20.26%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
6.20%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of CRWD's 24.73%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
2.33%
Tax expense growth while CRWD reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-8.43%
Net income decline while CRWD shows 29.52% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-7.82%
Net margin decline while CRWD shows 33.47% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-4.55%
EPS decline while CRWD shows 29.55% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-9.09%
Diluted EPS decline while CRWD shows 29.55% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
2.55%
Share count reduction below 50% of CRWD's 0.59%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.56%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of CRWD's 0.59%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.