503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-2.24%
Revenue decline while CRWD shows 5.94% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
4.05%
Cost growth 50-75% of CRWD's 7.31%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainable cost advantages.
-3.20%
Gross profit decline while CRWD shows 5.45% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-0.98%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
7.98%
R&D growth above 1.5x CRWD's 3.75%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.56%
Operating expenses growth less than half of CRWD's 3.48%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
1.46%
Total costs growth less than half of CRWD's 4.38%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
102.09%
D&A growth while CRWD reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
1.40%
EBITDA growth while CRWD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
8.23%
EBITDA margin growth while CRWD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-6.14%
Operating income decline while CRWD shows 9.37% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-3.98%
Operating margin decline while CRWD shows 14.45% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-8.71%
Other expenses reduction while CRWD shows 18.80% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-6.61%
Pre-tax income decline while CRWD shows 20.26% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-4.47%
Pre-tax margin decline while CRWD shows 24.73% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-6.65%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-6.59%
Net income decline while CRWD shows 29.52% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-4.45%
Net margin decline while CRWD shows 33.47% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-8.00%
EPS decline while CRWD shows 29.55% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-8.33%
Diluted EPS decline while CRWD shows 29.55% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.11%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x CRWD's 0.59%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
-0.13%
Diluted share reduction while CRWD shows 0.59% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.