PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
0.11%
Revenue growth below 50% of CRWD's 5.94%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
-1.94%
Cost reduction while CRWD shows 7.31% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
0.60%
Gross profit growth below 50% of CRWD's 5.45%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.49%
Margin expansion while CRWD shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
11.07%
R&D growth above 1.5x CRWD's 3.75%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
-100.00%
G&A reduction while CRWD shows 7.72% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
-100.00%
Marketing expense reduction while CRWD shows 1.68% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
17.99%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x CRWD's 3.48%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
10.95%
Total costs growth above 1.5x CRWD's 4.38%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
142.57%
D&A growth while CRWD reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-1.97%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
37.21%
EBITDA margin growth while CRWD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-12.86%
Operating income decline while CRWD shows 9.37% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-12.95%
Operating margin decline while CRWD shows 14.45% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-186.68%
Other expenses reduction while CRWD shows 18.80% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-44.29%
Pre-tax income decline while CRWD shows 20.26% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-44.35%
Pre-tax margin decline while CRWD shows 24.73% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-44.25%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-44.30%
Net income decline while CRWD shows 29.52% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-44.36%
Net margin decline while CRWD shows 33.47% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-44.00%
EPS decline while CRWD shows 29.55% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-48.00%
Diluted EPS decline while CRWD shows 29.55% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.01%
Share count reduction while CRWD shows 0.59% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.72%
Diluted share reduction while CRWD shows 0.59% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.