PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-7.92%
Revenue decline while CRWD shows 5.94% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-9.42%
Cost reduction while CRWD shows 7.31% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-7.56%
Gross profit decline while CRWD shows 5.45% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
0.38%
Margin expansion while CRWD shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
1.63%
R&D growth less than half of CRWD's 3.75%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
52.04%
G&A growth above 1.5x CRWD's 7.72%. Michael Burry would check for operational inefficiency.
-12.16%
Marketing expense reduction while CRWD shows 1.68% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.87%
Operating expenses growth less than half of CRWD's 3.48%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-2.34%
Total costs reduction while CRWD shows 4.38% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-23.38%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-16.51%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-10.40%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-16.51%
Operating income decline while CRWD shows 9.37% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-9.34%
Operating margin decline while CRWD shows 14.45% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-11.04%
Other expenses reduction while CRWD shows 18.80% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-16.00%
Pre-tax income decline while CRWD shows 20.26% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-8.78%
Pre-tax margin decline while CRWD shows 24.73% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-9.84%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-18.51%
Net income decline while CRWD shows 29.52% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-11.50%
Net margin decline while CRWD shows 33.47% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-17.14%
EPS decline while CRWD shows 29.55% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-14.71%
Diluted EPS decline while CRWD shows 29.55% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.43%
Share count reduction while CRWD shows 0.59% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-2.10%
Diluted share reduction while CRWD shows 0.59% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.