PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
16.01%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x CRWD's 5.94%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
113.44%
Cost growth above 1.5x CRWD's 7.31%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
-2.12%
Gross profit decline while CRWD shows 5.45% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-15.63%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-8.34%
R&D reduction while CRWD shows 3.75% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
22.59%
G&A growth above 1.5x CRWD's 7.72%. Michael Burry would check for operational inefficiency.
36.88%
Marketing expense growth above 1.5x CRWD's 1.68%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
17.43%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x CRWD's 3.48%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
43.13%
Total costs growth above 1.5x CRWD's 4.38%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
46.59%
D&A growth while CRWD reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-22.40%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-27.32%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-22.40%
Operating income decline while CRWD shows 9.37% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-33.11%
Operating margin decline while CRWD shows 14.45% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-41.27%
Other expenses reduction while CRWD shows 18.80% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-24.52%
Pre-tax income decline while CRWD shows 20.26% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-34.94%
Pre-tax margin decline while CRWD shows 24.73% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-24.57%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-24.50%
Net income decline while CRWD shows 29.52% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-34.92%
Net margin decline while CRWD shows 33.47% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-22.86%
EPS decline while CRWD shows 29.55% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-25.71%
Diluted EPS decline while CRWD shows 29.55% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1.24%
Share count reduction while CRWD shows 0.59% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.68%
Diluted share reduction while CRWD shows 0.59% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.