PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
10.41%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x CRWD's 5.94%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
37.18%
Cost growth above 1.5x CRWD's 7.31%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
4.17%
Similar gross profit growth to CRWD's 5.45%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry dynamics.
-5.65%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.31%
R&D growth less than half of CRWD's 3.75%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
-6.31%
G&A reduction while CRWD shows 7.72% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
20.30%
Marketing expense growth above 1.5x CRWD's 1.68%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.16%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x CRWD's 3.48%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
17.97%
Total costs growth above 1.5x CRWD's 4.38%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.03%
D&A growth while CRWD reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-1.00%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-6.13%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1.00%
Operating income decline while CRWD shows 9.37% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-10.34%
Operating margin decline while CRWD shows 14.45% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-3662.50%
Other expenses reduction while CRWD shows 18.80% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-5.89%
Pre-tax income decline while CRWD shows 20.26% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-14.77%
Pre-tax margin decline while CRWD shows 24.73% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-9.52%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-4.55%
Net income decline while CRWD shows 29.52% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-13.55%
Net margin decline while CRWD shows 33.47% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.08%
EPS decline while CRWD shows 29.55% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.08%
Diluted EPS decline while CRWD shows 29.55% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1.99%
Share count reduction while CRWD shows 0.59% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-2.93%
Diluted share reduction while CRWD shows 0.59% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.