PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-4.02%
Revenue decline while CRWD shows 5.94% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-8.10%
Cost reduction while CRWD shows 7.31% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-2.96%
Gross profit decline while CRWD shows 5.45% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
1.10%
Margin expansion while CRWD shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
0.59%
R&D growth less than half of CRWD's 3.75%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
16.29%
G&A growth above 1.5x CRWD's 7.72%. Michael Burry would check for operational inefficiency.
7.08%
Marketing expense growth above 1.5x CRWD's 1.68%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
-100.00%
Other expenses reduction while CRWD shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
2.03%
Operating expenses growth 50-75% of CRWD's 3.48%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
-1.06%
Total costs reduction while CRWD shows 4.38% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.56%
D&A growth while CRWD reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
5.18%
EBITDA growth while CRWD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-13.89%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-10.16%
Operating income decline while CRWD shows 9.37% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-6.40%
Operating margin decline while CRWD shows 14.45% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
139.95%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x CRWD's 18.80%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
2.27%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of CRWD's 20.26%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
6.56%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of CRWD's 24.73%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
2.24%
Tax expense growth while CRWD reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
2.28%
Net income growth below 50% of CRWD's 29.52%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
6.57%
Net margin growth below 50% of CRWD's 33.47%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
3.03%
EPS growth below 50% of CRWD's 29.55%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
3.03%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of CRWD's 29.55%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.10%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x CRWD's 0.59%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.63%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of CRWD's 0.59%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.