PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
20.22%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x CRWD's 5.94%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
49.27%
Cost growth above 1.5x CRWD's 7.31%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
12.15%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x CRWD's 5.45%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-6.71%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
1.80%
R&D growth less than half of CRWD's 3.75%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
-3.70%
G&A reduction while CRWD shows 7.72% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
29.72%
Marketing expense growth above 1.5x CRWD's 1.68%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
1350.00%
Other expenses change of 1350.00% while CRWD maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
13.47%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x CRWD's 3.48%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
26.77%
Total costs growth above 1.5x CRWD's 4.38%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
1.06%
Interest expense growth while CRWD reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-6.61%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
10.90%
EBITDA growth while CRWD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-8.46%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
10.98%
Operating income growth 1.25-1.5x CRWD's 9.37%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
-7.69%
Operating margin decline while CRWD shows 14.45% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
137.86%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x CRWD's 18.80%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
12.77%
Pre-tax income growth 50-75% of CRWD's 20.26%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
-6.20%
Pre-tax margin decline while CRWD shows 24.73% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
3.00%
Tax expense growth while CRWD reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
15.44%
Net income growth 50-75% of CRWD's 29.52%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
-3.98%
Net margin decline while CRWD shows 33.47% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
16.18%
EPS growth 50-75% of CRWD's 29.55%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
14.71%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of CRWD's 29.55%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.12%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x CRWD's 0.59%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
-0.29%
Diluted share reduction while CRWD shows 0.59% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.