PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
3.75%
Revenue growth 50-75% of CRWD's 5.94%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize if slower growth is temporary.
5.34%
Cost growth 50-75% of CRWD's 7.31%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainable cost advantages.
3.28%
Gross profit growth 50-75% of CRWD's 5.45%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive position.
-0.45%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
3.06%
Similar R&D growth to CRWD's 3.75%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry innovation requirements.
-1.22%
G&A reduction while CRWD shows 7.72% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
10.75%
Marketing expense growth above 1.5x CRWD's 1.68%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
935.00%
Other expenses change of 935.00% while CRWD maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
6.07%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x CRWD's 3.48%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
5.81%
Total costs growth 1.25-1.5x CRWD's 4.38%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize control.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
4.05%
D&A growth while CRWD reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-74.07%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
1.80%
EBITDA margin growth while CRWD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-96.99%
Operating income decline while CRWD shows 9.37% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-97.10%
Operating margin decline while CRWD shows 14.45% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
1618.18%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x CRWD's 18.80%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
-94.36%
Pre-tax income decline while CRWD shows 20.26% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-94.56%
Pre-tax margin decline while CRWD shows 24.73% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-32.19%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-109.63%
Net income decline while CRWD shows 29.52% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-109.28%
Net margin decline while CRWD shows 33.47% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-109.62%
EPS decline while CRWD shows 29.55% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-109.78%
Diluted EPS decline while CRWD shows 29.55% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.15%
Share count reduction while CRWD shows 0.59% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-1.29%
Diluted share reduction while CRWD shows 0.59% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.