PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-4.51%
Revenue decline while CRWD shows 5.94% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-15.90%
Cost reduction while CRWD shows 7.31% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-0.39%
Gross profit decline while CRWD shows 5.45% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
4.31%
Margin expansion while CRWD shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
4.43%
R&D growth 1.1-1.25x CRWD's 3.75%. Bill Ackman would demand evidence of superior returns.
43.25%
G&A growth above 1.5x CRWD's 7.72%. Michael Burry would check for operational inefficiency.
-11.95%
Marketing expense reduction while CRWD shows 1.68% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-142.42%
Other expenses reduction while CRWD shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
1.21%
Operating expenses growth less than half of CRWD's 3.48%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-5.90%
Total costs reduction while CRWD shows 4.38% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
3.81%
Interest expense growth while CRWD reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
4.36%
D&A growth while CRWD reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-1.34%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
2.78%
EBITDA margin growth while CRWD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-2.05%
Operating income decline while CRWD shows 9.37% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
2.58%
Operating margin growth below 50% of CRWD's 14.45%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-800.00%
Other expenses reduction while CRWD shows 18.80% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-2.15%
Pre-tax income decline while CRWD shows 20.26% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
2.47%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of CRWD's 24.73%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
11.13%
Tax expense growth while CRWD reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-5.05%
Net income decline while CRWD shows 29.52% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.57%
Net margin decline while CRWD shows 33.47% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-5.26%
EPS decline while CRWD shows 29.55% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-5.26%
Diluted EPS decline while CRWD shows 29.55% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.35%
Share count reduction while CRWD shows 0.59% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.18%
Diluted share reduction while CRWD shows 0.59% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.