503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-2.89%
Revenue decline while CRWD shows 5.94% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
17.03%
Cost growth above 1.5x CRWD's 7.31%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
-8.97%
Gross profit decline while CRWD shows 5.45% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-6.25%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
5.42%
R&D growth 1.25-1.5x CRWD's 3.75%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize investment rationale.
-26.93%
G&A reduction while CRWD shows 7.72% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
11.44%
Marketing expense growth above 1.5x CRWD's 1.68%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
231.25%
Other expenses change of 231.25% while CRWD maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
1.62%
Operating expenses growth less than half of CRWD's 3.48%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
7.35%
Total costs growth above 1.5x CRWD's 4.38%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
10.09%
Interest expense growth while CRWD reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-6.65%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-17.31%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-14.10%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-20.22%
Operating income decline while CRWD shows 9.37% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-17.84%
Operating margin decline while CRWD shows 14.45% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
900.00%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x CRWD's 18.80%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
-19.18%
Pre-tax income decline while CRWD shows 20.26% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-16.77%
Pre-tax margin decline while CRWD shows 24.73% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-23.77%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-18.00%
Net income decline while CRWD shows 29.52% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-15.56%
Net margin decline while CRWD shows 33.47% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-18.06%
EPS decline while CRWD shows 29.55% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-18.06%
Diluted EPS decline while CRWD shows 29.55% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.23%
Share count reduction while CRWD shows 0.59% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
0.15%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x CRWD's 0.59%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.