503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-6.87%
Revenue decline while CRWD shows 5.94% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-8.16%
Cost reduction while CRWD shows 7.31% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-6.37%
Gross profit decline while CRWD shows 5.45% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
0.54%
Margin expansion while CRWD shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-0.57%
R&D reduction while CRWD shows 3.75% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-19.09%
G&A reduction while CRWD shows 7.72% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
-21.85%
Marketing expense reduction while CRWD shows 1.68% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-23.81%
Other expenses reduction while CRWD shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-14.24%
Operating expenses reduction while CRWD shows 3.48% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-11.78%
Total costs reduction while CRWD shows 4.38% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-1.67%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-2.95%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-0.08%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
10.48%
EBITDA margin growth while CRWD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
4.30%
Operating income growth below 50% of CRWD's 9.37%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
11.99%
Similar operating margin growth to CRWD's 14.45%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
2.78%
Other expenses growth less than half of CRWD's 18.80%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
4.28%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of CRWD's 20.26%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
11.97%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of CRWD's 24.73%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-1.36%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
5.62%
Net income growth below 50% of CRWD's 29.52%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
13.41%
Net margin growth below 50% of CRWD's 33.47%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
6.78%
EPS growth below 50% of CRWD's 29.55%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
5.08%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of CRWD's 29.55%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.07%
Share count reduction while CRWD shows 0.59% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.09%
Diluted share reduction while CRWD shows 0.59% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.