PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
14.60%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x CRWD's 5.94%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
27.05%
Cost growth above 1.5x CRWD's 7.31%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
9.44%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x CRWD's 5.45%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-4.50%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
13.85%
R&D growth above 1.5x CRWD's 3.75%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
17.75%
G&A growth above 1.5x CRWD's 7.72%. Michael Burry would check for operational inefficiency.
32.19%
Marketing expense growth above 1.5x CRWD's 1.68%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
8.33%
Other expenses change of 8.33% while CRWD maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
23.18%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x CRWD's 3.48%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
24.90%
Total costs growth above 1.5x CRWD's 4.38%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-3.43%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
38.80%
D&A growth while CRWD reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
21.71%
EBITDA growth while CRWD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-11.37%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-7.05%
Operating income decline while CRWD shows 9.37% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-18.90%
Operating margin decline while CRWD shows 14.45% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
658.82%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x CRWD's 18.80%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
-5.46%
Pre-tax income decline while CRWD shows 20.26% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-17.51%
Pre-tax margin decline while CRWD shows 24.73% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
51.50%
Tax expense growth while CRWD reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-18.52%
Net income decline while CRWD shows 29.52% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-28.90%
Net margin decline while CRWD shows 33.47% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-17.65%
EPS decline while CRWD shows 29.55% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-19.12%
Diluted EPS decline while CRWD shows 29.55% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.46%
Share count reduction while CRWD shows 0.59% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.26%
Diluted share reduction while CRWD shows 0.59% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.