PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-17.91%
Revenue decline while CRWD shows 5.94% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-29.35%
Cost reduction while CRWD shows 7.31% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-10.81%
Gross profit decline while CRWD shows 5.45% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
8.65%
Margin expansion while CRWD shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
2.79%
R&D growth 50-75% of CRWD's 3.75%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine spending effectiveness.
-0.55%
G&A reduction while CRWD shows 7.72% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
-14.04%
Marketing expense reduction while CRWD shows 1.68% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
87.08%
Other expenses change of 87.08% while CRWD maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
-6.39%
Operating expenses reduction while CRWD shows 3.48% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-19.00%
Total costs reduction while CRWD shows 4.38% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
30.25%
Interest expense growth while CRWD reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-0.39%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-13.53%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
7.99%
EBITDA margin growth while CRWD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-15.20%
Operating income decline while CRWD shows 9.37% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
3.30%
Operating margin growth below 50% of CRWD's 14.45%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-204.05%
Other expenses reduction while CRWD shows 18.80% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-16.98%
Pre-tax income decline while CRWD shows 20.26% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
1.13%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of CRWD's 24.73%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-22.90%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-14.98%
Net income decline while CRWD shows 29.52% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
3.58%
Net margin growth below 50% of CRWD's 33.47%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-14.08%
EPS decline while CRWD shows 29.55% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-14.08%
Diluted EPS decline while CRWD shows 29.55% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.74%
Share count reduction while CRWD shows 0.59% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.72%
Diluted share reduction while CRWD shows 0.59% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.