503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
16.77%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x CRWD's 5.94%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
36.98%
Cost growth above 1.5x CRWD's 7.31%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
5.71%
Similar gross profit growth to CRWD's 5.45%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry dynamics.
-9.47%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-2.09%
R&D reduction while CRWD shows 3.75% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-4.24%
G&A reduction while CRWD shows 7.72% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
18.81%
Marketing expense growth above 1.5x CRWD's 1.68%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
84.95%
Other expenses change of 84.95% while CRWD maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
7.03%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x CRWD's 3.48%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
21.83%
Total costs growth above 1.5x CRWD's 4.38%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
24.10%
Interest expense growth while CRWD reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
5.68%
D&A growth while CRWD reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
4.02%
EBITDA growth while CRWD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-9.64%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
4.02%
Operating income growth below 50% of CRWD's 9.37%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-10.92%
Operating margin decline while CRWD shows 14.45% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
38.93%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x CRWD's 18.80%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
6.20%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of CRWD's 20.26%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-9.05%
Pre-tax margin decline while CRWD shows 24.73% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
36.99%
Tax expense growth while CRWD reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
2.37%
Net income growth below 50% of CRWD's 29.52%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-12.33%
Net margin decline while CRWD shows 33.47% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
3.28%
EPS growth below 50% of CRWD's 29.55%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
1.64%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of CRWD's 29.55%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.40%
Share count reduction while CRWD shows 0.59% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.41%
Diluted share reduction while CRWD shows 0.59% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.