PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
17.78%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x CRWD's 5.94%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
26.22%
Cost growth above 1.5x CRWD's 7.31%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
13.07%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x CRWD's 5.45%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-3.99%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1.42%
R&D reduction while CRWD shows 3.75% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-15.89%
G&A reduction while CRWD shows 7.72% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
26.76%
Marketing expense growth above 1.5x CRWD's 1.68%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
-1046.67%
Other expenses reduction while CRWD shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
8.83%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x CRWD's 3.48%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
17.80%
Total costs growth above 1.5x CRWD's 4.38%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
19.22%
Interest expense growth while CRWD reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
19.27%
D&A growth while CRWD reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
18.05%
EBITDA growth while CRWD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-1.30%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
17.72%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x CRWD's 9.37%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-0.05%
Operating margin decline while CRWD shows 14.45% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
4.46%
Other expenses growth less than half of CRWD's 18.80%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
17.50%
Similar pre-tax income growth to CRWD's 20.26%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
-0.23%
Pre-tax margin decline while CRWD shows 24.73% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
51.29%
Tax expense growth while CRWD reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
10.59%
Net income growth below 50% of CRWD's 29.52%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-6.10%
Net margin decline while CRWD shows 33.47% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
10.96%
EPS growth below 50% of CRWD's 29.55%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
11.11%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of CRWD's 29.55%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.44%
Share count reduction while CRWD shows 0.59% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.58%
Diluted share reduction while CRWD shows 0.59% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.