PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-10.12%
Revenue decline while CRWD shows 5.94% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-18.59%
Cost reduction while CRWD shows 7.31% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-4.85%
Gross profit decline while CRWD shows 5.45% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
5.86%
Margin expansion while CRWD shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
9.57%
R&D growth above 1.5x CRWD's 3.75%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
36.75%
G&A growth above 1.5x CRWD's 7.72%. Michael Burry would check for operational inefficiency.
-5.07%
Marketing expense reduction while CRWD shows 1.68% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
76.74%
Other expenses change of 76.74% while CRWD maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
5.10%
Operating expenses growth 1.25-1.5x CRWD's 3.48%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize control.
-7.99%
Total costs reduction while CRWD shows 4.38% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
16.89%
Interest expense growth while CRWD reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
13.25%
D&A growth while CRWD reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-8.89%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
2.69%
EBITDA margin growth while CRWD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-14.95%
Operating income decline while CRWD shows 9.37% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-5.38%
Operating margin decline while CRWD shows 14.45% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
217.09%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x CRWD's 18.80%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
-11.57%
Pre-tax income decline while CRWD shows 20.26% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1.61%
Pre-tax margin decline while CRWD shows 24.73% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-8.38%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-12.46%
Net income decline while CRWD shows 29.52% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.60%
Net margin decline while CRWD shows 33.47% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-12.35%
EPS decline while CRWD shows 29.55% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-12.50%
Diluted EPS decline while CRWD shows 29.55% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.39%
Share count reduction while CRWD shows 0.59% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.22%
Diluted share reduction while CRWD shows 0.59% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.