PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
0.45%
Revenue growth below 50% of CRWD's 5.94%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
4.91%
Cost growth 50-75% of CRWD's 7.31%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainable cost advantages.
-1.92%
Gross profit decline while CRWD shows 5.45% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-2.36%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
4.74%
R&D growth 1.25-1.5x CRWD's 3.75%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize investment rationale.
12.73%
G&A growth above 1.5x CRWD's 7.72%. Michael Burry would check for operational inefficiency.
12.50%
Marketing expense growth above 1.5x CRWD's 1.68%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
42.50%
Other expenses change of 42.50% while CRWD maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
9.44%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x CRWD's 3.48%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
7.23%
Total costs growth above 1.5x CRWD's 4.38%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
7.55%
Interest expense growth while CRWD reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-4.48%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-6.90%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-13.31%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-20.72%
Operating income decline while CRWD shows 9.37% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-21.08%
Operating margin decline while CRWD shows 14.45% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-370.89%
Other expenses reduction while CRWD shows 18.80% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-21.84%
Pre-tax income decline while CRWD shows 20.26% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-22.19%
Pre-tax margin decline while CRWD shows 24.73% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-160.20%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
18.72%
Net income growth 50-75% of CRWD's 29.52%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
18.19%
Net margin growth 50-75% of CRWD's 33.47%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
18.31%
EPS growth 50-75% of CRWD's 29.55%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
18.57%
Diluted EPS growth 50-75% of CRWD's 29.55%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
-0.13%
Share count reduction while CRWD shows 0.59% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.09%
Diluted share reduction while CRWD shows 0.59% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.