PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-5.11%
Revenue decline while CRWD shows 15.74% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-11.19%
Cost reduction while CRWD shows 18.28% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-2.04%
Gross profit decline while CRWD shows 14.69% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
3.23%
Margin expansion while CRWD shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
6.17%
R&D growth less than half of CRWD's 13.79%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
13.56%
G&A growth while CRWD reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
-0.45%
Marketing expense reduction while CRWD shows 5.21% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
84.21%
Other expenses growth less than half of CRWD's 893.57%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
3.88%
Operating expenses growth while CRWD reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-4.21%
Total costs reduction while CRWD shows 3.08% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-6.12%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-2.65%
D&A reduction while CRWD shows 8.63% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-5.86%
EBITDA decline while CRWD shows 36.36% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.55%
EBITDA margin decline while CRWD shows 45.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-6.59%
Operating income decline while CRWD shows 23.94% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1.57%
Operating margin decline while CRWD shows 34.28% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-168.04%
Other expenses reduction while CRWD shows 660.49% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-8.82%
Pre-tax income decline while CRWD shows 31.57% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-3.91%
Pre-tax margin decline while CRWD shows 40.88% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-14.16%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-7.70%
Net income decline while CRWD shows 31.58% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.73%
Net margin decline while CRWD shows 40.88% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-7.84%
EPS decline while CRWD shows 57.50% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-7.28%
Diluted EPS decline while CRWD shows 57.50% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.25%
Share count reduction while CRWD shows 56.89% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.21%
Diluted share reduction while CRWD shows 56.89% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.