PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
14.15%
Revenue growth 1.25-1.5x CRWD's 11.51%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if growth advantage is sustainable.
24.29%
Cost growth above 1.5x CRWD's 15.19%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
9.78%
Similar gross profit growth to CRWD's 10.22%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry dynamics.
-3.83%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
2.84%
R&D growth less than half of CRWD's 15.70%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
7.54%
G&A growth less than half of CRWD's 18.81%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is structural.
18.30%
Marketing expense growth 1.25-1.5x CRWD's 13.86%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize spending rationale.
-166.67%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
9.52%
Operating expenses growth 50-75% of CRWD's 15.24%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
17.55%
Total costs growth 1.1-1.25x CRWD's 15.23%. Bill Ackman would demand justification.
-2.60%
Interest expense reduction while CRWD shows 10.79% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
8.84%
D&A growth 50-75% of CRWD's 11.94%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine asset strategy.
9.78%
EBITDA growth while CRWD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-4.11%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
9.93%
Operating income growth while CRWD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-3.70%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-6.29%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
9.70%
Pre-tax income growth while CRWD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-3.90%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
19636.84%
Tax expense growth while CRWD reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-8.49%
Net income decline while CRWD shows 32.61% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-19.83%
Net margin decline while CRWD shows 39.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-8.42%
EPS decline while CRWD shows 34.21% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-8.49%
Diluted EPS decline while CRWD shows 34.21% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.11%
Share count reduction while CRWD shows 0.99% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.16%
Diluted share reduction while CRWD shows 0.99% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.