503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-3.36%
Revenue decline while CRWD shows 13.18% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-5.95%
Cost reduction while CRWD shows 12.62% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-2.16%
Gross profit decline while CRWD shows 13.38% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
1.24%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x CRWD's 0.18%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-3.23%
R&D reduction while CRWD shows 17.50% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-20.07%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
-18.69%
Marketing expense reduction while CRWD shows 19.03% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-34.78%
Other expenses reduction while CRWD shows 91.30% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-11.74%
Operating expenses reduction while CRWD shows 12.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-8.70%
Total costs reduction while CRWD shows 12.58% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
0.81%
Interest expense growth while CRWD reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-29.88%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-2.62%
EBITDA decline while CRWD shows 82.26% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
2.97%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of CRWD's 48.96%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
4.79%
Operating income growth while CRWD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
8.44%
Similar operating margin growth to CRWD's 10.34%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
214.89%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x CRWD's 33.25%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
5.30%
Pre-tax income growth 1.25-1.5x CRWD's 4.22%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
8.96%
Pre-tax margin growth 50-75% of CRWD's 15.38%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
7.18%
Tax expense growth while CRWD reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
4.87%
Net income growth below 50% of CRWD's 27.56%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
8.52%
Net margin growth below 50% of CRWD's 36.00%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
4.91%
EPS growth below 50% of CRWD's 22.22%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
5.38%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of CRWD's 27.78%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.23%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-0.28%
Diluted share reduction while CRWD shows 0.66% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.