PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
5.24%
Revenue growth 50-75% of CRWD's 9.70%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize if slower growth is temporary.
13.18%
Cost growth 1.1-1.25x CRWD's 10.83%. Bill Ackman would demand evidence of cost control initiatives.
1.70%
Gross profit growth below 50% of CRWD's 9.30%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-3.36%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
3.26%
R&D growth less than half of CRWD's 11.72%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
67.17%
G&A growth above 1.5x CRWD's 18.11%. Michael Burry would check for operational inefficiency.
10.79%
Marketing expense growth 50-75% of CRWD's 16.14%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine spending effectiveness.
-22.58%
Other expenses reduction while CRWD shows 5.23% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
12.99%
Similar operating expenses growth to CRWD's 15.07%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
13.09%
Similar total costs growth to CRWD's 14.02%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
-2.00%
Interest expense reduction while CRWD shows 10.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
30.75%
D&A growth above 1.5x CRWD's 7.24%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
-0.45%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-5.77%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-5.20%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-9.92%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-211.11%
Other expenses reduction while CRWD shows 254.63% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-5.72%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-10.41%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-2.54%
Tax expense reduction while CRWD shows 38.90% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-6.44%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-11.10%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-6.38%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-6.38%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.08%
Share count reduction while CRWD shows 3.28% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.16%
Diluted share reduction while CRWD shows 0.59% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.