PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
6.30%
Revenue growth 50-75% of CRWD's 9.72%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize if slower growth is temporary.
4.14%
Cost growth less than half of CRWD's 10.98%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
7.26%
Similar gross profit growth to CRWD's 9.25%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry dynamics.
0.90%
Margin expansion while CRWD shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-3.51%
R&D reduction while CRWD shows 23.57% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
33.72%
G&A growth above 1.5x CRWD's 0.99%. Michael Burry would check for operational inefficiency.
7.90%
Marketing expense growth above 1.5x CRWD's 2.82%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
34.41%
Other expenses growth while CRWD reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
5.31%
Operating expenses growth 50-75% of CRWD's 9.22%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
4.69%
Total costs growth less than half of CRWD's 9.66%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-2.82%
Interest expense reduction while CRWD shows 0.28% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
9.16%
D&A growth 1.1-1.25x CRWD's 7.46%. Bill Ackman would demand investment justification.
12.29%
EBITDA growth below 50% of CRWD's 30.31%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
2.63%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of CRWD's 45.70%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
8.51%
Operating income growth while CRWD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
2.07%
Operating margin growth exceeding 1.5x CRWD's 0.66%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
47.35%
Other expenses growth 50-75% of CRWD's 67.73%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine cost efficiency.
9.06%
Pre-tax income growth exceeding 1.5x CRWD's 4.68%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
2.59%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of CRWD's 13.13%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
6.22%
Tax expense growth while CRWD reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
9.74%
Similar net income growth to CRWD's 10.43%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
3.23%
Net margin growth below 50% of CRWD's 18.37%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
9.76%
EPS growth 1.25-1.5x CRWD's 8.70%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
9.80%
Diluted EPS growth 1.25-1.5x CRWD's 8.70%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
-0.09%
Share count reduction while CRWD shows 0.53% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
0.04%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x CRWD's 0.53%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.