PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
0.58%
Revenue growth below 50% of CRWD's 8.66%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
-2.94%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
2.08%
Gross profit growth below 50% of CRWD's 13.34%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
1.49%
Margin expansion below 50% of CRWD's 4.30%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-1.19%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
-32.91%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
-16.39%
Marketing expense reduction while CRWD shows 14.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-124.59%
Other expenses reduction while CRWD shows 108.27% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-12.02%
Operating expenses reduction while CRWD shows 3.73% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-7.24%
Total costs reduction while CRWD shows 1.88% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
8.92%
Interest expense growth above 1.5x CRWD's 0.55%. Michael Burry would check for over-leverage.
1.21%
D&A growth less than half of CRWD's 9.81%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
5.96%
EBITDA growth below 50% of CRWD's 544.75%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
9.28%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of CRWD's 509.30%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
10.89%
Operating income growth below 50% of CRWD's 118.37%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
10.25%
Operating margin growth below 50% of CRWD's 116.90%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-17.76%
Other expenses reduction while CRWD shows 36.25% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
10.34%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of CRWD's 111.25%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
9.70%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of CRWD's 110.36%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
7.47%
Tax expense growth while CRWD reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
11.01%
Net income growth below 50% of CRWD's 101.00%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
10.36%
Net margin growth below 50% of CRWD's 100.92%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
11.11%
EPS growth below 50% of CRWD's 101.00%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
11.15%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of CRWD's 100.95%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.07%
Share count reduction while CRWD shows 0.59% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.07%
Diluted share reduction while CRWD shows 2.37% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.