PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
9.74%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x CRWD's 5.64%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
20.37%
Cost growth above 1.5x CRWD's 8.09%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
5.43%
Gross profit growth 1.25-1.5x CRWD's 4.85%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
-3.93%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
7.25%
R&D growth above 1.5x CRWD's 0.17%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
34.12%
G&A growth less than half of CRWD's 85.45%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is structural.
20.42%
Marketing expense growth while CRWD reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
-23.36%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
15.35%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x CRWD's 3.92%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
18.11%
Total costs growth above 1.5x CRWD's 4.91%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
73.14%
Interest expense growth above 1.5x CRWD's 0.89%. Michael Burry would check for over-leverage.
51.98%
D&A growth above 1.5x CRWD's 10.77%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
7.06%
EBITDA growth below 50% of CRWD's 27.53%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-3.98%
EBITDA margin decline while CRWD shows 20.73% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.51%
Operating income growth while CRWD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-8.41%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-230.08%
Other expenses reduction while CRWD shows 16.81% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-2.78%
Pre-tax income decline while CRWD shows 166.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-11.40%
Pre-tax margin decline while CRWD shows 152.42% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-6.75%
Tax expense reduction while CRWD shows 4.58% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-1.89%
Net income decline while CRWD shows 1625.46% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-10.59%
Net margin decline while CRWD shows 1533.37% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.00%
EPS decline while CRWD shows 1595.24% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.01%
Diluted EPS decline while CRWD shows 1650.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.04%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x CRWD's 0.63%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.08%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x CRWD's 0.64%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.