PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
5.27%
Revenue growth below 50% of CRWV's 23.55%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
-13.64%
Cost reduction while CRWV shows 19.16% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
5.51%
Gross profit growth below 50% of CRWV's 25.15%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.22%
Margin expansion below 50% of CRWV's 1.30%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-4.78%
R&D reduction while CRWV shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.67%
Operating expenses reduction while CRWV shows 17.97% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-3.90%
Total costs reduction while CRWV shows 18.28% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.72%
D&A growth less than half of CRWV's 26.15%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
14.18%
EBITDA growth below 50% of CRWV's 33.05%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
8.06%
Similar EBITDA margin growth to CRWV's 7.69%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
15.87%
Operating income growth below 50% of CRWV's 169.93%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
10.07%
Operating margin growth below 50% of CRWV's 156.60%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
21.50%
Other expenses growth while CRWV reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
16.21%
Pre-tax income growth exceeding 1.5x CRWV's 9.63%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
10.39%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of CRWV's 26.86%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
13.03%
Tax expense growth above 1.5x CRWV's 3.78%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
18.01%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x CRWV's 7.67%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
12.10%
Net margin growth below 50% of CRWV's 25.27%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
16.67%
EPS growth 50-75% of CRWV's 23.08%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
18.18%
Similar diluted EPS growth to CRWV's 23.08%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
0.37%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x CRWV's 20.32%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.64%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x CRWV's 20.32%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.